Factors Associated with Acceptance of Repeat MCAT Test Takers into a West Virginian Allopathic Medical School.

OBJECTIVES: A paucity of information exists to advise medical school applicants who have had to retake the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) to achieve a competitive score. To better advise repeat test takers from West Virginia and other Appalachian and southern areas, MCAT data from West Virginia applicants were analyzed and compared with national data. METHODS: In the application cycles of 2017-2020, the following factors were analyzed in relation to medical school acceptance in West Virginia applicants: MCAT scores, the number of test-taking attempts, biology-chemistry-physics-math grade point average, time between test-taking attempts, and academic major. MCAT data from medical school applicants from West Virginia who took the test more than once also were compared with national data. RESULTS: Of the total repeat test takers from West Virginia (N = 285) in the study timeframe, 57 (20%) were ultimately accepted into medical school. Factors associated with medical school acceptance were as follows: first MCAT test score (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% confidence level [CL] 1.2-1.4, P < 0.001), change in MCAT test score (OR 1.2, 95% CL 1.1-1.3, P = 0.0015), and biology-chemistry-physics-math grade point average (OR 15.1, 95% CL 4.2-54.8, P < 0.0001). The highest benefit for improved scores occurred between the first and second attempts. The highest point gain occurred when the first MCAT score was in the range of 477 to 487 (<1st-12th percentile); this finding was not found in the national data. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study was limited to West Virginia medical school applicants, this information could prove useful in advising premedical applicants from other Appalachian and southern US areas.

Curvas de aprendizaje en laparoscopia / Laparoscopic learning curves

OBJETIVOS: La curva de aprendizaje en cirugía laparoscópica es lenta y no existen modelos uniformes de adquisición de habilidades quirúrgicas. Tratamos de establecer la idoneidad de un programa de aprendizaje de habilidades laparoscópicas en sujetos sin experiencia quirúrgica, analizando la curva de aprendizaje utilizando un simulador artesanal homologado. Comprobar si la experiencia quirúrgica previa modifica la curva de aprendizaje. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se empleó un simulador artesanal validado e instrumental laparoscópico para evaluar a 20 estudiantes universitarios que realizaron 10 repeticiones de tres ejercicios de dificultad creciente (coordinación ojo-mano, coordinación mano-mano y corte). Se evaluaron tres parámetros: tiempo total y con cada mano, errores totales y con cada mano y tres ítems de habilidad técnica OSATS. Comparación de los dos primeros ejercicios con un grupo de 14 cirujanos con experiencia. Análisis estadístico mediante Anova para medidas repetidas y t de Student (p < 0,05). RESULTADOS: Se demostró la mejoría significativa del tiempo con cada repetición en los tres ejercicios. La estabilización de la curva fue más precoz entre los cirujanos (2-4 repeticiones) que los estudiantes (8-9). Se comprobó la reducción del tiempo invertido para el primer y segundo ejercicio en ambos grupos, que en los estudiantes fue del 44,08% y 33,1% respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: Individuos sin experiencia quirúrgica desarrollan habilidades laparoscópicas básicas utilizando un simulador artesanal, que permite practicar técnicas quirúrgicas sencillas de forma barata y accesible. La experiencia quirúrgica previa se asocia con el acortamiento de la curva de aprendizaje. El simulador artesanal permite discriminar entre sujetos con y sin experiencia quirúrgica

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic learning curves are slow, and there are no uniform surgical skill acquisition models. Therefore, our objective was to assess a laparoscopic skill learning program in individuals without any surgical experience, analyzing the learning curve by means of a certified custom-made simulator, and evaluating whether previous surgical experience had an impact on the learning curve. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A certified custom-made simulator and laparoscopic instruments were used to assess 20 university students who performed 10 repetitions of 3 exercises of growing difficulty (eye-hand coordination, hand-hand coordination, and cutting). Three parameters were analyzed: total time with each hand, total mistakes with each hand, and three items of the OSATS technical skill scale. The two first exercises were compared with a group of 14 experienced surgeons. Statistical analysis using repeated-measures Anova and Student's t-test was carried out (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Significant time improvement with each repetition was demonstrated in the three exercises. Curve stabilization was faster in surgeons (2-4 repetitions) than in students (8-9). Time reduction was noted in the first and second exercises in both groups, with 44.08% and 33.1% shorter times, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals without surgical experience acquired basic laparoscopic skills using a custom-made simulator, which allows simple surgical techniques to be carried out in an inexpensive, accessible fashion. Previous surgical experience was associated with a shorter learning curve. The custom-made simulator allowed individuals with and without surgical experience to be distinguished from each other

Evaluating the numeracy skills of pharmacy students in multiple choice questions and free-text answer assessments and their perception of numeracy in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION: Numerical errors can cause unintentional harm to patients and are a burden to healthcare systems worldwide. There is a paucity of research regarding numerical competence in pharmacists and pharmacy students and how this should be assessed within undergraduate and licensure assessments. METHODS: Two numeracy assessments were given to year three and four pharmacy students at the University of Sunderland, United Kingdom. One paper included ten multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and the second ten free-text answer questions. Participants were then given an evaluation questionnaire to explore their perceptions about the assessments and numeracy in clinical practice. RESULTS: A response rate of 75% (n = 247) was achieved, with 60.9% of students passing the MCQ and 27.9% passing the free-text answer assessments. There were statistically significant differences in pass rates depending on year of study, ethnicity, and previous mathematics qualifications. Participants were asked if numeracy was an important skill for pharmacists in practice; 57.9% thought it were essential and 36.4% quite important. However, only 1.4% felt sufficiently supported in the development of the required numeracy skills, and this has prompted a redesign of teaching and assessment at the university. CONCLUSIONS: Educators need to ensure taught and assessed numeracy is reflective of and transferable to pharmacy practice, whilst ensuring students are supported effectively and engaged. This is likely to be achieved with integrated and clinically focused teaching approaches and appropriately constructed assessments throughout the pharmacy programme.

An initial environmental scan of APPE readiness assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Standards 2016 require schools/colleges of pharmacy (s/cop) to assess students' readiness to enter advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). However, literature describing how schools are meeting this standard is limited. The purpose of this study was to conduct an environmental scan to describe how s/cop assess student readiness to enter APPEs. METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed to assessment leads at United States s/cop, regardless of accreditation status. Respondents answered questions related to their current approach to assessing student APPE readiness, existence of intentional assessment plans, competencies used, assessment methods, benchmarks, and remediation strategies. Aggregate data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Fifty-two S/COP (36.1%) responded. The majority (90.1%) were fully accredited schools. Most respondents have an intentional APPE readiness plan (73.5%), although the duration since implementation varied. There was no consensus among schools on which competencies informed APPE readiness with 67.3% listing Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) 2013 outcomes, 61.2% Guidance for Standards 2016 Appendix A, 53.1% pre-APPE domains (Standards 2007), and 30.6% Entrustable Professional Activities. Twenty-eight S/COP (57.1%) reported having individual student-level data to assess student APPE readiness. The most common methods for validating student APPE readiness were preceptor (48.9%) and student (44.9%) surveys. CONCLUSIONS: This environmental scan begins to identify trends in how S/COP is approaching the assessment of student readiness to begin APPEs. Further research is needed to identify best practices and practical methods to ensure compliance with current accreditation standards.

Measurement precision at the cut score in medical multiple choice exams: Theory matters.

INTRODUCTION: In high-stakes assessment, the measurement precision of pass-fail decisions is of great importance. A concept for analyzing the measurement precision at the cut score is conditional reliability, which describes measurement precision for every score achieved in an exam. We compared conditional reliabilities in Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) with a special focus on the cut score and potential factors influencing conditional reliability at the cut score. METHODS: We analyzed 32 multiple-choice exams from three Swiss medical schools comparing conditional reliability at the cut score in IRT and CCT. Additionally, we analyzed potential influencing factors such as the range of examinees' performance, year of study, and number of items using multiple regression. RESULTS: In CTT, conditional reliability was highest for very low and very high scores, whereas examinees with medium scores showed low conditional reliabilities. In IRT, the maximum conditional reliability was in the middle of the scale. Therefore, conditional reliability at the cut score was significantly higher in IRT compared with CTT. It was influenced by the range of examinees' performance and number of items. This influence was more pronounced in CTT. DISCUSSION: We found that conditional reliability shows inverse distributions and conclusions regarding the measurement precision at the cut score depending on the theory used. As the use of IRT seems to be more appropriate for criterion-oriented standard setting in the framework of competency-based medical education, our findings might have practical implications for the design and quality assurance of medical education assessments.

Thai trauma nurses' knowledge of neuroprotective nursing care of traumatic brain injury patients: A survey study.

Thai trauma nurses play a vital role in neuroprotective nursing care of patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Nurses' knowledge of the evidence underpinning initial neuroprotective nursing care vital to safe and high-quality patient care. However, the current state of knowledge of Thai trauma nurses is poorly understood. In this study, we investigated Thai nurses' knowledge of neuroprotective nursing care of patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury. Data were collected by a survey, comprising a section on participant characteristics and series of multiple-choice questions. All registered nurses (n = 22) and nursing assistants (n = 13) from the trauma ward of a regional Thai hospital were invited to participate: the response rate was 100%. Participants had limited knowledge of carbon dioxide monitoring; causes and implications of hypercapnia; mean arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure targets; management of sedatives and analgesics; and management of hyperthermia. Improving their knowledge focusing on knowledge deficits through educational training and implementation of evidence-based practice is essential to improve the safety and quality of care for Thai patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.

A student initiative to implement peer-led study groups for a pharmacogenomics course: Evaluation of student performance and perceptions.

INTRODUCTION: To better elucidate the impact of cooperative learning outside the classroom, a student-initiated research project was conducted to explore the effects of participating in peer-led study groups (PLSGs) on student examination scores and perceptions. METHODS: First-year pharmacy students were given the opportunity to participate in weekly PLSGs for a pharmacogenomics course during spring 2016 and spring 2017. Student exam performance was stratified by those who attended vs. those who did not. Optional pre- and post-course surveys examined student perceptions of PLSGs. RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between the attendance groups in spring 2016. In spring 2017, student attendees were significantly more likely to pass two of their six exams (p = .04, p = .0029) and to have higher exam scores on one exam (p = .02) in comparison to non-attendees. Overall exam score averages were significantly different between attendees and non-attendees during spring 2017 (p = .03) but not during spring 2016 (p = .38). Perception surveys indicated students believed participation helped them to demonstrate competency and build confidence. Additionally, students reported they felt more comfortable clarifying questions during the study groups vs. during class time. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of study group participation on student exam performance was minimal over the two years of data collection, but there were instances where exam scores were positively impacted. Students perceived value in study group participation even if it did not translate directly to improved exam performance on all exams.

The effect of sleep quality, sleep components, and environmental sleep factors on core curriculum exam scores among pharmacy students.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep deprivation is associated with poor academic performance, although the impact on pharmacy students has been minimally reported. This study examined sleep quality in pharmacy students in the first (P1), second (P2), and third (P3) professional years during perceived low and high stress periods in a course. Individual sleep and environmental factors were also explored. METHODS: This prospective cohort study used an 18-item survey adapted from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) that included demographics, individual sleep components, and factors affecting sleep. Surveys were administered at the beginning of the quarter (low stress) and the week before final exams (high stress). Chi-square tests compared categorical variables; ANOVA/ANCOVA tests compared continuous variables. RESULTS: During high stress, PSQI scores worsened among all classes and was significant for the P3s. Average sleep duration was 6.64 (SD 1.18) and 6.8 (SD 1.18) hours per night for P1s and P3s, respectively, at the beginning of the quarter; both groups had significant reduction in sleep duration at the end of the quarter. There were no significant correlations between PSQI and exam scores. Factors impacting sleep such as exercise, use of technology at bedtime, and work hours outside of school decreased during high times of stress, for P1s, P2s, and P3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Students demonstrated worsening sleep quality during high stress periods and less sleep than recommended. Academic performance was not adversely affected. Future research should use sleep logs and other performance measures to determine the impact of sleep quality on academic success and wellbeing.

A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.

In low-stakes assessments, test performance has few or no consequences for examinees themselves, so that examinees may not be fully engaged when answering the items. Instead of engaging in solution behaviour, disengaged examinees might randomly guess or generate no response at all. When ignored, examinee disengagement poses a severe threat to the validity of results obtained from low-stakes assessments. Statistical modelling approaches in educational measurement have been proposed that account for non-response or for guessing, but do not consider both types of disengaged behaviour simultaneously. We bring together research on modelling examinee engagement and research on missing values and present a hierarchical latent response model for identifying and modelling the processes associated with examinee disengagement jointly with the processes associated with engaged responses. To that end, we employ a mixture model that identifies disengagement at the item-by-examinee level by assuming different data-generating processes underlying item responses and omissions, respectively, as well as response times associated with engaged and disengaged behaviour. By modelling examinee engagement with a latent response framework, the model allows assessing how examinee engagement relates to ability and speed as well as to identify items that are likely to evoke disengaged test-taking behaviour. An illustration of the model by means of an application to real data is presented.

Investigating Group Differences in Examinees' Preparation for and Performance on the New MCAT Exam.

In 2015, the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) was redesigned to better assess the concepts and reasoning skills students need to be ready for the medical school curriculum. During the new exam's design and rollout, careful attention was paid to the opportunities examinees had to learn the new content and their access to free and low-cost preparation resources. The design committee aimed to mitigate possible unintended effects of the redesign, specifically increasing historical mean group differences in MCAT scores for examinees from lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds and races/ethnicities underrepresented in medicine compared with those from higher SES backgrounds and races/ethnicities not underrepresented in medicine.In this article, the authors describe the characteristics and scores of examinees who took the new MCAT exam in 2017 and compare those trends with historical ones from 2013, presenting evidence that the diversity and performance of examinees has remained stable even with the exam's redesign. They also describe the use of free and low-cost MCAT preparation resources and MCAT preparation courses for examinees from higher and lower SES backgrounds and who are enrolled in undergraduate institutions with more and fewer resources, showing that examinees from lower SES backgrounds and who attend institutions with fewer resources use many free and low-cost test preparation resources at lower rates than their peers. The authors conclude with a description of the next phase of this research: to gather qualitative and quantitative data about the preparation strategies, barriers, and needs of all examinees, but especially those from lower SES and underrepresented racial/ethnic backgrounds.

Impacto de diferentes modalidades de evaluación en el promedio de notas de estudiantes de Medicina: un estudio de intervención no aleatorizado / Impact of different types of evaluation on the average grade of medicine students: a non-randomized interventional study

Introducción: en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje existen múltiples conflictos al momento de seleccionar el tipo de evaluación que debería aplicarse a estudiantes de Medicina. Nuestro objetivo es comparar diferencias en la media de notas de tres modalidades de examen (oral, escrito para desarrollar y preguntas de opción múltiple) para así determinar cómo estas podrían afectar el desempeño de los estudiantes de Medicina en el campo de la Farmacología. Material y métodos: estudio cuasi experimental con una intervención no aleatorizada en una muestra por conveniencia de estudiantes de Medicina. A fin de evaluar diferencias en la media de notas se hizo un análisis ANOVA para muestras pareadas y luego los correspondientes tests de T para muestras pareadas. Resultados: enrolamos inicialmente a 36 estudiantes; 7 fueron excluidos (4 por ausencia y 3 por abandono), y se obtuvieron 29 participantes. La media de notas del examen oral y la de preguntas de opción múltiple fueron ambas significativamente superiores a la del examen escrito para desarrollar (oral vs. escrito: diferencia 1,8 puntos; IC 95% 0,8 a 2,7; p < 0,01; opción múltiple vs. escrito: diferencia 2,1 puntos; IC 95% 1,4 a 2,9; p < 0,01). No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las notas medias del examen oral y del examen de preguntas de opción múltiple (p = 0,37). Conclusión: los estudiantes de Medicina obtienen peores notas en el examen escrito para desarrollar en Farmacología, en relación con los exámenes oral y de preguntas de opción múltiple. Esto posiblemente se asocie al hecho de que aquella modalidad es menos frecuentemente empleada en la carrera de Medicina. (AU)

Introduction: in the teaching-learning process, there are many problems in the selection of the most suitable type of exam for evaluating medical students. Our target was to compare differences in the average grade of medical students upon taking three different types of exam (oral, written, and multiple-choice questions) to determine how these different types of exam may affect the performance of medical students in the area of Pharmacology. Material and methods: we conducted a quasi experimental study by applying a non-randomized intervention to a convenience sample of medical students. To evaluate differences in the average grades among three groups, an ANOVA analysis was applied followed by paired T-tests. Results: we initially enrolled 36 students; 7 were excluded (4 were absent and 3 abandoned the intervention), arriving at a total sum of 29 participants. The average grades of the oral exam and multiple-choice questions were both significantly higher than the written exam (oral vs. written: difference 1.8 points; 95%CI 0.8 to 2.7, p < 0.01; multiple-choice vs. written: difference 2.1 points, 95%CI 1.4 to 2.9, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the average grades on the oral exam and the multiple-choice exam (p = 0.37). Conclusion: medical students have worse grades on written exams in Pharmacology, as compared to oral and multiple-choice exams. This could possibly be associated with the fact that this type of exam is less frequently applied in Medical School. (AU)

Effect of a study skills course on student self-assessment of learning skills and strategies.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a study skills course taken by first professional year pharmacy students improved their self-assessment of study skills and strategies. METHODS: This study analyzed student responses to the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI), an online assessment with questions in 10 subject areas: anxiety, motivation, concentration, test strategies, study aids, selecting main ideas, attitude, self-testing, information processing, and time management. Students in an elective study skills course in 2012-2017 completed the self-assessment prior to and at the end of the course. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare class score pre- and post-course. RESULTS: Over a five-year period, 312 students completed both the pre- and post-course LASSI assessment. Average percentile scores increased significantly from the beginning to the end of the course in all 10 areas. Notably, average pre-course scores in seven subject areas (attention, concentration, self-testing, selecting main ideas, study aids, time management, and test strategies) were all below the 50th percentile, indicating a need for improvement in those skills to see increased academic success. Average post-course scores in each area increased to between the 50th and 75th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation shows that a study skills course improves students' self-assessment of skills and attitudes associated with success in post-secondary education. Future studies will look at the effect of such a course on academic outcomes.

Predicting NAPLEX scores using student performance in the clinical skills laboratory setting.

INTRODUCTION: Many predictors of success on the North American Pharmacist Licensure Exam (NAPLEX) have been studied, but little information is available regarding the effect of assessments in the clinical skills setting on student success. One way to determine if these assessments affect NAPLEX success is to review student performance in clinical skills laboratory courses (termed patient care lab ["PCL"] at our institution), which incorporate such assessments. METHODS: Students (n = 88) enrolled in a four quarter PCL sequence completed several individual assessments (both knowledge and skills-based), including drug information (DI) quizzes/final exams, patient case presentations and associated critical thinking questions, and formal DI responses. Linear regression assessed the relationship between PCL assessments and NAPLEX scores. Statistical tests were performed using IBM SPSS version 22 with a p-value <0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: While drug information responses were not predictive of total NAPLEX scores (p = 0.192), the patient case presentation and associated critical thinking questions predicted 31.1% of variability (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Performance of one cohort of students on certain pharmacy clinical skills lab assessments was predictive of total scores on the NAPLEX. Students who struggle with assessments in the clinical skills lab setting may be targets for early intervention to help improve the likelihood of success. More research is needed to fully elucidate the relationship between assessments in the clinical skills lab setting and NAPLEX performance.

Impact of a low-cost simulated electronic medical record on perceptions of APPE readiness.

BACKGROUND: Meaningful use of electronic medical records (EMRs) is critical for providing high-quality, patient-centered care. However, many pharmacy students are not exposed to EMRs until the experiential components of the curriculum. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: We created a low-cost simulated EMR (SEMR) using Microsoft PowerPoint software (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, Version 16.16) to use in a case-based application course for second-year pharmacy students for two consecutive years. FINDINGS: Pre- and post-assessment surveys of 162 students indicated that perceived confidence and efficiency navigating EMRs improved after the activity. Students agreed that the activity enhanced learning, improved understanding of how to extract meaningful data from EMRs, benefited their preparation for the fourth professional year, and demonstrated the role of informatics in patient care. SUMMARY: Incorporation of a SEMR using Microsoft PowerPoint enhances student perceptions of proficiency in navigating the patient medical record. Adoption of similar activities into pharmacy curricula may be an attractive option when adequate financial resources for simulation are unavailable.

A model to predict NAPLEX outcomes and identify students needing additional preparation.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have been conducted to identify factors that may predict North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) outcomes, but there is no proposed single or combination of predictors that can be implemented reliably in academia. We aimed to develop a NAPLEX outcomes predictive model that could be practical, measurable, and reliable. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of students who graduated from 2012 to 2016 who had taken NAPLEX and whose first-attempt examination scores were available to the school of pharmacy. Students were considered to have poor performance on NAPLEX if they received an overall score of less than or equal to 82. Linear and logistic regression analysis were utilized to identify independent predictors. RESULTS: Seventy of 433 (16.2%) students were identified as poor performers. Independent factors that were associated with a poor outcome on NAPLEX were: age >28 years at graduation, Pharmacy College Admission Test scaled score <74, High Risk Drug Knowledge Assessment score <90, third-year Pharmacy Curriculum Outcome Assessment scaled score <349, and grades of <74 in more than three courses. These predictors were utilized to stratify students into four risk groups: Low, Intermediate-1, Intermediate-2, and High. Mean NAPLEX scores for these groups were 106.4, 97.4, 87.1, and 75.1, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The model can be used as a practical tool to identify students who are at risk for poor performance on NAPLEX. Four of the five predictors in the model could be generalizable to other schools of pharmacy.

A web-based review game as a measure of overall course knowledge in pharmacotherapeutics.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Implementation of games is common in pharmacy education, but limited information exists about the relationship between students' game performances and course grades. Our study was designed to determine if scores on a comprehensive web-based review game correlate to overall pharmacotherapeutics course and course series grades. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Two cohorts of students in Pharmacotherapeutics IV, the last course in a four course series, were administered a web-based quiz review game (Kahoot!) at the end of the course. Student performance on the game was compared to grades throughout the Pharmacotherapeutics course sequence to determine if the games were reflective of the students' performances. All students enrolled in Pharmacotherapeutics IV in 2016 and 2017 were included in the analysis. Pearson correlation was performed on the scores from the review game compared to the grades in the pharmacotherapeutics course series. FINDINGS: A total of 197 students, 111 in the 2016 cohort and 86 in the 2017 cohort, were included in the analysis. The correlation coefficient (r) for the review scores and Pharmacotherapeutics IV course grade was 0.399 and 0.461 for the 2 cohorts (p < 0.001). Almost all component comparisons between the review scores and the other pharmacotherapeutics course grades were also significantly correlated (p < 0.01). SUMMARY: Student performance on the review game significantly correlated with pharmacotherapeutics course grades. Review games are fun tools to review course content and can serve as an effective method to determine student understanding, progression, and knowledge.

What Patients Want in a Smartphone App That Supports Colonoscopy Preparation: Qualitative Study to Inform a User-Centered Smartphone App.

BACKGROUND: The preparation for colonoscopy is elaborate and complex. In the context of colorectal cancer screening, up to 11% of patients do not keep their colonoscopy appointments and up to 33% of those attending their appointments have inadequately cleansed bowels that can delay cancer diagnosis and treatment. A smartphone app may be an acceptable and wide-reaching tool to improve patient adherence to colonoscopy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this qualitative study was to employ a user-centered approach to design the content and features of a smartphone app called colonAPPscopy to support individuals preparing for their colonoscopy appointments. METHODS: We conducted 2 focus group discussions (FGDs) with gastroenterology patients treated at the McGill University Health Centre in Montreal, Canada. Patients were aged 50 to 75 years, were English- or French-speaking, and had undergone outpatient colonoscopy in the previous 3 months; they did not have inflammatory bowel disease or colorectal cancer. FGDs were 75 to 90 min, conducted by a trained facilitator, and audiotaped. Participants discussed the electronic health support tools they might use to help them prepare for the colonoscopy, the content needed for colonoscopy preparation, and the features that would make the smartphone app useful. Recordings of FGDs were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key user-defined content and features to inform the design of colonAPPscopy. RESULTS: A total of 9 patients (7 male and 2 female) participated in one of 2 FGDs. Main content areas focused on bowel preparation instructions, medication restrictions, appointment logistics, communication, and postcolonoscopy expectations. Design features to make the app useful and engaging included minimization of data input, reminders and alerts for up to 7 days precolonoscopy, and visual aids. Participants wanted a smartphone app that comes from a trusted source, sends timely and tailored messages, provides reassurance, provides clear instructions, and is simple to use. CONCLUSIONS: Participants identified the need for postcolonoscopy information as well as reminders and alerts in the week before colonoscopy, novel content, and features that had not been included in previous smartphone-based strategies for colonoscopy preparation. The ability to tailor instructions made the smartphone app preferable to other modes of delivery. Study findings recognize the importance of including potential users in the development phase of building a smartphone app.

Experience with implementing pyramid examinations in an elective pharmacy course.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This article describes the implementation of pyramid tests, an assessment strategy that utilizes individual and cooperative testing for formal examinations in an elective course for third year pharmacy students. This strategy provides individual accountability and uses group collaboration to extend students depth of thinking through essay responses. Pyramid tests have been suggested as a way to improve grading efficiency compared to traditional tests that use essay questions. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: A two-credit hour pharmacy elective taught by synchronous video conferencing on two campuses of a large public university utilized pyramid tests for both the midterm and final examinations. Each examination had individual and group components and utilized a simple metacognitive question. FINDINGS: The averages from the individual portions of the pyramid tests were similar to the prior year, while the combined group (2/3 weight) and individual (1/3 weight) pyramid test scores averages were slightly higher than the previous year's average (87% compared to 86%, respectively). Student feedback on this assessment technique was generally positive. SUMMARY: This assessment strategy was an efficient way to test students' knowledge. Although it had a collaborative component, it also provided individual accountability. Time spent on course administration and grading was similar to previous years that employed fixed choice assessments without collaborative work.

Longitudinal Examination of Aggression and Study Skills From Middle to High School: Implications for Dropout Prevention.

BACKGROUND: High school completion provides health and economic benefits. The purpose of this study is to describe dropout rates based on longitudinal trajectories of aggression and study skills using teacher ratings. METHODS: The sample consisted of 620 randomly selected sixth graders. Every year from Grade 6 to 12, a teacher completed a nationally normed behavioral rating scale. We used latent class mixture modeling to identify the trajectories. RESULTS: Participants followed 3 trajectories of aggression (Low, Medium Desisting, and High Desisting) and 5 trajectories of study skills (Low, Average-Low, Decreasing, Increasing, and High). Over three-quarters of the sample were in stable trajectories of study skills over time. Most students in the High Desisting Aggression group were in the Low Study Skills group, and all students in the High Study Skills group were in the Low Aggression group. The overall dropout rate was 17%, but varied dramatically across combined aggression and study skills groups, ranging from 2% to 50%. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the importance of early prevention that combines academic enhancement and behavioral management for reducing school dropout.